Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Focus and Coverage Topics include the following fields (but not limited to):


1. Economic Education:

  • Development Economics Education
  • Entrepreneurship Education
  • Accounting education
  • Business and Management Education
  • Office Administration Education
  • Analysis of economic teacher assignments
  • economic learning outcomes
  • economic learning activities
  • social science education

2. Entrepreneurship:

  • Marketing Analysis
  • E-business and e-Commerce
  • Product innovation
  • Entrepreneurial motivation
  • Entrepreneurial spirit
  • Entrepreneurial Achievement
  • Micro small and Medium Enterprises


 3. Business and management:

  • Business process management
  • Marketing Management
  • Business and management strategies
  • Online business
  • Customer relationship management
  • Supply Chain Management and Logistics
  • Corporate Resource Planning
  • Excellent service
  • Production management
  • Business Analysis and Knowledge Discovery
  • Service Science and Innovation
  • Innovation in the Digital Economy
  • Accounting system


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Every running script is assessed with the following rules:

  1. The authenticity of its contribution in the field of scientific publishing, methodological and theoretical reliability is taken according to the topic, analysis of coherence, grammar, and writing in accordance with existing rules.
  2. Every text submitted by the author will conduct a peer review. Each article will be reviewed by a minimum of three reviewers.
  3. Articles will be accepted by at least two reviewers and with permission from the editor.
  4. The principle of recruiting reviewers at least write scientific journals as the first author, or a member of the author on three pages of articles, both national-scale scientific journal publications and international-scale scientific journal publications.
  5. Each paper submitted will be examined by the section editor, if it does not fit the scope of the journal JPEKBM (Economic Education, Entrepreneurship, Business and Management), it will be returned for rejection, so if there are things that are not in accordance with the scope of the journal , then the paper will be returned to the author, if according to the specified scope, then it will be assigned to reviewers.
  6. The paper review process uses a double blind method involving two reviewers who have been chosen by the section editor, if there are conflicting decisions among reviewers, it will be an additional reviewer to decide whether the article was accepted or rejected.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.


Publication Ethics

JPEKBM: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, Kewirausahaan, Bisnis dan Manajemen. is a peer-reviewed electronic national journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the editorial Board, the peer-reviewers and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers..

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JPEKBM is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer-reviewers, the publisher and the society.  

Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi STKIP PGRI Jombang as publisher of JPEKBM takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication Decisions

The editor of JPEKBM is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Peer reviewers assist the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse her/himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

 Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper


Publication Fee

This journal charges author fees as follows: 

Article submission: IDR 0.00

Authors are not required to pay the cost of submitting articles to the JPEKBM Editor.

Article publication:

If the article submitted by the author is accepted for publication, then the author will be charged an article processing fee (APC) of Rp. 300,000.00.