PERCEPTION OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS WITH METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY TO INCREASE STUDENTS ABILITY IN LISTENING COMPREHENSION
Abstract
Listening comprehension should emphasize the process, students focus during learning to build their knowledge through a series of speakers so that learning becomes meaningful to students. Listening skills can be classified into two parts, basic skills and integrated skills. In principle, basic skills and integrated skills have in common in terms of formulating problems, collecting data and proposing problem solving solutions. Metacognitive refers to higher-order thinking that involves active control in the cognitive process of learning in solving a problem. Activities such as analyzing English speakers, increasing understanding, and evaluating listening comprehension are natural metacognitive. Metacognitive is the ability to think in which the object of thinking is the thought process that occurs in yourself. In the context of learning, students know how to learn, know their abilities and learning modalities, and know the best learning strategies for effective learning. Metacognitive as a form of ability to look at oneself so that what he does can be controlled optimally. Students with metacognitive knowledge are aware of the advantages and limitations of learning. This means that when students know their mistakes, they realize to admit that they are wrong, and try to correct it. For this reason, pre-service teachers need to try to train students to have metacognitive abilities and bring them up so that they can ultimately improve their listening comprehension. Before that, it is necessary to know how pre-service teachers 'perceptions of metacognitive strategies are to improve students' abilities in lisetening comperhension. This article will focus on the understanding and perceptions of pre-service teachers of metacognitive strategies. This study will examine seven respondents from 5k semester students of English Language Education Program at Universitas Ibn Khaldun. Research conducted using quantitative and qualitative, by giving questionnaires and conducting interviews which then proceed to the analysis of the data. The results are intended that the majority of pre-service teachers still do not fully understand metacognitive strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest, April 2002. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.
Birjandi, P., Mirhassani, A., & Abbasian, G. (2006). Setting-based metacognitive strategy use. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2Fb. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities Psychology, 49(198), 39-87.
Chamot, A. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190505000061
Cohen, A., & Dӧrnyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles and strategies. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 170-190). London: Arnold.
Dunlosky, J. (2013). and Katherine A. Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning
Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14(1) 4–58 doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266
Flavell, J. H. .(1963). Metacognition Theory. Theories of Learning in Educational
Psychology. Second Edition
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B Resnick (Ed). The nature of intelegence.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Harris, V. (2003). Adapting classroom-based strategy instruction to a distance learning context. TESOL Internet Journal, 7(20).
Hung-Jen Wang (2002). Heteroscedasticity and Non-Monotonic Efficiency Effects of a Stochastic Frontier Model. Journal of Productivity Analysis. Doi: 10.1023/A:1020638827640
Jaušovec, N. (2012). Working memory training: Improving intelligence – Changing brain
activity. Brain and Cognition 79, 96–106.
Kaspar, G. (1984). Pragmatic Comprehension in Learner - Native Speaker Discourse. Language Learning, 34, 1-20
O’Malley, J., & Chamot, M. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490
O’Malley, J., Chamot, M., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.4.418
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House Harper Collins.
Oxford, R. L. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 166-172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.025
Pongtiku, A .(2016). BUKU METODOLOGI KUALITATIF, Third Edition
Priyono (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. ZIFATAMA
Rost, M .(2011) Teaching and Researching Listening Michael Rost Second Edition.
Longman
Vandergrift, L. (2006). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 70-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh039
Zarabi, F. (2016). The Impact of Listening Strategy Training on the Meta-Cognitive
Listening Strategies Awareness of Different Learner Types. Canadian Center of Science and Education 9(5) 154-165 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p154
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32682/jeell.v6i2.1373
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 JEELL (Journal of English Education, Linguistics and Literature) English Departement of STKIP PGRI Jombang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.