stars77 slot online stars77 indro77 indro77 indro77 helenaslot helenaslot helenaslot
A BEST PRACTICE OF TWO STAY TWO STRAY IN TEACHING READING | Rafi | JEELL (Journal of English Education, Linguistics and Literature) English Departement of STKIP PGRI Jombang

A BEST PRACTICE OF TWO STAY TWO STRAY IN TEACHING READING

Muhammad Farhan Rafi

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to know the implementation of Two stay Two Stray in teacing reading and students’ responses in teaching reading with the technique of Two Stay Two Stray. The researcher used a descriptive qualitative design in conducting the research. The participant is third semester students of English Department of STKIP PGRI Jombang in academic year 2017/2018. to collect the data the researcher uses a field note, observation checklist and  questionaire. The result shows that Teaching reading by using “Two Stay Two Stray” focused on the students’ center activity and focused on improving students’ skills. Most of the students also agree TSTS influences their ability. It can make them getting easy in understanding the text. In TSTS, the students got many activities in understanding the text. Each activities has special features. The first way concerns to group work and the second way can be group work, pair work, or individual work. Based on the questionnaires given to the students, most of the students enjoy the class well.

Keywords: Two Stay Two Stray, Students’ Responses


Full Text:

PDF

References


ArisAgung, W. (2013). The Effectiveness of Using Two Stay Two Stray Technique in Teaching Reading Comprehension of Second Year Students in SMP N 1 Sumbergempol in Academic Year 2012/2013. (Thesis, IAIN Tulungagung)

Bolukbas, F., Keskin, F., & Polat, M. (2011). The effectiveness of cooperative learning in the reading comprehension skills in Turkish as a foreign language. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 330-335.

Braine, G. (2010) Non‐native‐speaker English teachers. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Brown, D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.

Çakici, Dilek. (2007) The Attitudes of University Students towards English within the scope of Common Compulsory Courses. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF) 3.

Gomleksiz, M. N. (2007). Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method on teaching English as a foreign language to engineering students (Case of Firat University, Turkey). European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 613-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F03043790701433343

Graddol, D. (1997). The Future of English? The British Council.

Harahap, F. A. (2012). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension through Two Stay–Two Stray Learning Model. Transform Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning of FBS UNIMED, 1(1).

Huckin, T. N., Haynes, M., & Coady, J. (1993). Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Learning. New York, NY: Ablex Pub. Co.

Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2004). English language teaching in China: A bridge to the future. In W. K. Ho, & R. Y.

Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning. (2nd ed.). San Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.

Latief, M.A. (2013). Research Methods on Language Learning An Introduction. Malang: UM Press.

Lie, Anita. (2002. Cooperative Learning. Jakarta: Gramedia

Ning, H. (2011). Adapting cooperative learning in tertiary ELT. ELT Journal, 65(1), 60-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Felt%2Fccq021

Nunan, D. (2003) The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia‐Pacific Region. TESOL quarterly 37 (4) 589-613.

Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter.

Pan, C. Y., & Huang, P. C. (2009). The development and evaluation of a web-based college English outside reading system for EFL freshmen. JALT CALL Journal, 5(3), 3-22.

Pan, C. Y., & Wu, H. Y. (2013). The cooperative learning effects on English reading comprehension and learning motivation of EFL freshmen. English Language Teaching, 6(5), 13.

Sugiyanto.(2009). Model – Model PembelajaranInovatif.Surakarta :PanitiaSertifikasi Guru rayon 13 FKIP UNS Surakarta.

Suh, J. S. (2009). Reading concepts in cooperative work by EFL college students. English Teaching, 64(2), 151-171.

Tsai, T. C. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on teaching English reading comprehension and attitude of senior students in high school. Journal of Research on Elementary Education, 13, 261-283.

Wei, C. L. (1996). Cooperative English learning activities: Perceptions of Taiwanese college students. Educational Research, 4, 13-26.

Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, Tg. N R M.(2010). Collaborative strategic reading with university EFL learners. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(1), 67-94.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32682/jeel.v4i2.666

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 JEELL (Journal of English Education, Liguistics and Literature)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by English Department of STKIP PGRI Jombang

Jl. Pattimura III/20, Jombang, East Java, Indonesia

Currently, JEELL (Journal of English Education, Linguistics and Literature) English Departement of STKIP PGRI Jombang is indexed by:

   
     
     
     
     
     

Dedicated to:

In affiliation with:

Print ISSN 2356-5446, Online ISSN 2598-3059

 Flag Counter

View My Stats

Published by STKIP PGRI Jombang || http://stkipjb.ac.id/


Creative Commons License
JEELL (Journal of English Education, Language and Literature) English Departement of STKIP PGRI Jombang  English Departement of STKIP PGRI Jombang  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

ngentot ngentot kontol kontol ngentot kontol ngentot kontol